This week’s field activity was a continuation of the last two weeks field activities, which involved creating a navigational map and learning to navigate using that map and a compass. The purpose of this week’s field activity was to learn how to navigate using a global positioning system (GPS) unit, without the assistance of a map. To do this our professor provided each person with a sheet of paper that contained a series of points with their latitude and longitude (lat/long) coordinate locations (image 1). Every person was also provided with GPS unit (image 2).
Image 1: Sheet
provided to us by our professor with the point’s lat/long coordinate location
Image 2: GPS unit used
for navigation
Image 3: Location of
lat/long coordinates on the GPS unit
Image 4: Compass on
GPS used for traversing from point to point
Methods
To begin this activity we first had to locate our starting
point. As mentioned above, we did this by matching the lat/long of the GPS unit
to the lat/long point 1 provided on the sheet of paper (image 5).
Image 5: GPS unit used
to navigate from point to point by matching the lat/long to the sheet of paper
with lat/long coordinates for each point
Once we reached our starting point we turned our track log
on (image 6). Once the track log is turned on the GPS unit begins tracking the
route you walk. It is very important to turn this on otherwise you will not end
up with any data at the end of your navigation to see how well you traversed
from point to point using lat/long coordinates.
Image 6: Location on
the GPS where the track log is turned on and off
Image 7: Point
markings the navigation courses
We also used the compass, located on the same screen as the
lat/long coordinates (image 8), to help us get a better idea of which direction
we needed to be walking. As mentioned earlier, this is because latitude
measures your location north and south, while longitude measures location east
and west.
Image 8: Lat/long
coordinates and compass located on same screen for more efficient tracking of
directional movement
After the navigation was done every person downloaded their
data from their GPS unit onto a computer as shapefiles. To do this I used a
program called DNR GPS was that was already installed on the computers (image 9).
Image 9: The DNR GPS
program used to download my track log points onto the computer
1. First, the GPS unit needed to be connected to the computer with a USB port cord (image 10).
Image 10: GPS unit connected
to the computer with a USB port cord
Image 12: “Connect to
Default GPS” was chosen from the “GPS” dropdown menu
Image 14: “Download”
was chosen from the “Track” tab dropdown menu
Image 15: Computer
downloaded track log data from GPS unit
Image 16: “Save to”
then “File” is chosen from the “File” dropdown menu
Image 17: Navigate to my
class folder to save my data as an “ESRI Shapefile”
Image 18: Chose to
save my data as a “point” shapefile
After checking the projection of my track log I saw that is
was in GCS_WGS_1984 (image 20). It was projected in this coordinate system
because that’s what the GPS unit I was using was set up as.
Image 20: Track log
downloaded in a GCS_WGS_1984 coordinate system
Image 21: Using the
toolbox in ArcMap to project my track log feature class into the correct
projection
Image 22: NAD 1983 UTM
Zone 15N as the chosen projection for my track log
Image 23: My track log
after the projection
Results
Map 1 depicts my individual track log. It shows that overall
navigation from point to point was a little curvy. I certainly didn’t walk in a
straight line from point to point.
Map 1: My individual
track route
Map 2: My groups track
routes in relation to one another’s
Map 3: All six groups
track routes in relation to each other
In short, after reviewing that results of all the maps we can see that navigation from point to point wasn’t perfect form anyone, or any group. We can also see in every course both teams traversing the course took different routes. This goes to show that navigating using a GPS unit probably isn’t the most effective and efficient navigational technique. It would be interesting to see how the results would differ if a map depicting the landscape was involved in the process.
Conclusion
Overall, I found this form of navigation to be much harder
than using a compass and pace count. I found that a map would’ve been much more
helpful with this exercise than having with the compass and pace count exercise.
Having a map that depicted the landscape terrain would’ve assisted the group in
knowing if the point being navigated to was on top of a ridge, or in a valley.
This would’ve been helpful because it had just snowed a lot that day and
throughout the prior weekend. This made traversing the landscape very difficult
and tiring.
I also found that it would’ve been helpful to have had a
plastic baggie to put the piece of paper in with the point’s locational data.
This is because the water from the snow made the paper difficult to read (image
24).
Image 24: Paper with point
locational information was hard to read due to it getting wet from the snow
Like the previous activity we found that it was important to
keep an eye on the lat/long onour GPS units. This is because the courses
intersected one another, so at times you would come to a point on your course
that wasn’t your intended target. Being that this navigation exercise was more
difficult than the last one, seeing a point on your course made it easy to be
lured to it without thinking about whether it was yours or another team’s
point. We actually made this mistake and
traveled out of our navigation route to get to a point we thought was ours.
When we got to it there was another team there. After debating whose it was we
realized we were wrong. This goes to show the importance of paying attention
and following your coordinates. It also shows how weather conditions can
influence how you think and work. Like I stated earlier there was a lot of snow
and traversing the hilly landscape with the difficult navigation technique all
led to us navigating poorly towards the end when we were tired.
No comments:
Post a Comment